Which method leads to the goal?
However, his combatants was disturbed that al-Suri regarded the organization only as a necessary precursor of global Jihadism and that it was less about how to institutionalize terrorism but more about which ”method” would lead to the goal, namely, the destruction of the main enemy the USA and its most important allies, Israel and the European states.
Above all, al-Suri said that ”normalization” should be avoided in the relationship between immigrated Muslims and the local peoples. As long as an open uprising in the Western countries is not to be expected – since this would be left to a later phase – the enemy should be unsettled and weakened by individual actions. Everyone could become a ”holy warrior” by attacking unbelievers, especially Jews and people who through their way of life are causing displeasure in the eyes of the believers.
The attack in Manchester corresponds precisely to this concept. The murderer, child of Libyan refugees, well-integrated for many years, has done what al-Suri has suggested: Radical separation from those to thank for security, home, education and income.
Original article in German: https://jungefreiheit.de/debatte/kommentar/2017/wehrlos-in-vielfalt/
An excerpt of the document mentioned above translated into English: TheCallForAGlobalIslamicResistanceSomeKeyParts

[…] https://petterssonsblogg.se/2017/06/04/abu-musab-al-suri-global-islamic-resistance/ […]