Såg ni Agenda ikväll?

Programledaren Anders Holmberg gjorde ett utmärkt jobb när han ställde både Isabella Lövin (MP) och Jan Björklund (L) mot väggen när det gäller nya regeringskonstellationer efter valet 2018.

Lövin och hela Miljöpartiet är lika ointressanta som en finne på röven, men Jan Björklund trodde jag mer om. Att han använder samma väl inövade retorik om SD:s ”nynazistiska” rötter är en sak. Han vet att han måste använda orden för att vara med i gänget. Att han däremot hellre ser hur landet Sverige dras ned längre ned i gyttjan än samtalar med Sveriges näst största parti, är ett bottennapp också för en liberal. Tyvärr tror jag samtliga Allianspartier och Socialdemokraterna irrat bort sig och vågar nu inte erkänna SD och det faktum att över 1 miljon svenskar röstar på dem. Hellre använda uttjatad retorik, hellre göra allt tvärtemot vad SD vill och hellre bjuda in MP till regeringssamarbete.

Hoppas det svenska folket läser mellan raderna och inser att ingen regering är villig att se problemen som problemen verkligen är, oavsett om regeringen är höger, vänster eller mittemellan.

Agenda

https://www.politicalislam.com/

Sharia_Law_for_Non-Muslims

• Here is a Sharia example taken from ”The Reliance of the Traveller” supported by the Koran. Note that is not a law, but a definition of a word and what a duty of a Muslim is, 09.0 JIHAD: Jihad means war against Kafirs to establish Islam. Koran 2:216: You are commanded to fight although you dislike it. You may hate something that is good for you, and love something that is bad for you. Allah knows and you do not.
• But the word Kafir means far more than non-Muslim. The original
  meaning of the word was “concealer”, one who conceals the truth of Islam. The Koran says that the Kafir may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse. The word is usually translated as “unbeliever” but this translation is wrong. The word “unbeliever” is logically and emotionally neutral, whereas, Kafir is the most abusive, prejudiced and hateful word in any language.
• A Kafir can be terrorized – Koran 8:12:  Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, “I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the Kafirs’ hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!”

abusive – förnedrande, prejudiced – fördomsfull

In the video/discussion (see below) politicians resp. persons of state authorities and others comment and debate on what has been and is being done when it comes to the terror attack in Manchester and other planned or “successful” attacks

Something that is stressed from the side of the authorities, is the good work done by the police when it comes to foil plots. But trying to catch the jihadists and other people involved already in the planning state is only one counter measure that alone will show nothing but very limited success if not combined by a row of other measures like e.g.:

• To understand what and who motivates and produces jihadists and to put the finger on that and take strong and effective counter actions.
• To prohibit anyone that is likely to become involved in both motivating, planning, financing and carrying out these attacks to enter the country in the first place as well as stop the associated money flows from abroad. This could mean prohibiting certain groups completely from immigrating to and even entering the country.
• To deport the ones involved in any way even if it means to strip them from their British nationality (if they have also another).

Just trying to catch the persons involved in time and fining them or send them off to a short prison stay for motivating, financing and planning terror attacks will not stop them from trying again. As we know, these persons are normally even more radicalized when they come out of prison than before they entered. A fine is clearly also not efficient, e.g. their financiers in the gulf states has so much money that they can’t even stand straight.

If you have a machine (in the west) producing jihadists faster and faster every day and have personnel that try to catch them before they hit, your personnel will not always be successful in doing so. Not even if you hire more and more personnel trying to cope with it and that even if done to a point when it no longer can be financed. To have any real success you will have to stop the machine from increasing its speed, slow down the speed and this is likely “utopia” stop the machine completely.

The analogy is the cake machine and every time the workers are not quick enough to decorate it and put in in a carton it will fall to the ground and be destroyed. However, in this case it is only a cake and not a high number of our countrywomen/men being killed or severely injured each time.

How politicians and persons of state authorities argue in this debate show on nothing but limitless naivety, cowardliness and dishonesty and is a spit in the face not at least to the victims of the Manchester attack and their families:

Conclusion: Not much more than byzantine chitchat (by the people in charge) just like before Constantinople fell.